From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 16 16:28:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A5816A474 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B3743D46 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:28:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5AF9122C6D; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:27:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:27:59 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060616162759.GA98272@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <200606141616.21658.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200606160816.44477.lofi@freebsd.org> <200606161102.58509@aldan> <20060616152208.GA24948@soaustin.net> <20060616154818.GA25414@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060616161553.GC26094@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bWTBxx0QKOXH2iZ2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060616161553.GC26094@soaustin.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.4-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:28:01 -0000 --bWTBxx0QKOXH2iZ2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:15:53AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 05:48:18PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > > How do we go about changing ports? Do .la-only changes need the > > PORTREVISION bumped because the pkg-plist necessarily changed? >=20 > Yes, because it will affect the packages. >=20 > > Should we (I'm wearing my porter's hat now), submit .la-only changes? >=20 > My own view is that we should change them only if we're already making > some other change in the port, so slowly they'll all be changed (or, of > course, there is already a plist error). I haven't polled the other > portmgrs. >=20 > And new ports should have them. >=20 For ports that are working right now, I don't see the big hurry to get these changes in. So we should stop adding more hacks to remove the .la files and slowly (re)add them with the normal updates. Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin@FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin@aauug.dk --bWTBxx0QKOXH2iZ2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEktwPqy9aWxUlaZARAh8OAJ9ZcNcBvA+6M8UiCezVfgrBucfpRQCfQ28h v4bUgwVOWKWlvpNmgE5uUas= =l6/r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bWTBxx0QKOXH2iZ2--