From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 00:02:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42832148E7D0; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BE188A91; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B9033E25; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:02:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [46.57.105.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F098833E23; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:02:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:02:41 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Antoine Brodin cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r490825 - head/emulators/wine In-Reply-To: <201901210745.x0L7j0ft072601@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201901210745.x0L7j0ft072601@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D9BE188A91 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.96 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.965,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:02:46 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Log: > Revert r490816, it breaks INDEX Interestingly I didn't do that on my 11/i386 tester, but I managed to reproduce elsewhere and had a fix about the time you committed your reversal; just a minute too slow. I'll do some further testing and simplify based on good input from Mathieu and re-commit in a few days. Gerald