From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Mar 1 11:35:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AE137B401 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EBC43F3F for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h21JZh1o080752 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h21JZgGe000661 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h21JZggs000660 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:42 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux base/devtools/kdump Message-ID: <20030301193542.GB548@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030301191622.GC294@galgenberg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030301191622.GC294@galgenberg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:16:22PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > I wanted to know what is planned in respect to the linux-ports. First of > all, will there be a linux_base-8 port any time soon? Not by me. > Then I found out, that the port-nameing is kind of non-user friendly: > > RH6: linux_base-6 linux_devtools linux_kdump > RH7: linux_base linux_devtools-7 N/A I know. > If RH7 is going to be the default for many more releases to come, I > would kindly ask marcel@ to please provide an updated linux_kdump port, > because it won't compile with RH7 I have it somewhere on the bottom of my todo list. > I got WINE compiled under a /compat/linux chroot and it's failing > because of missing ioctl's and I figured that I would need linux_kdump > to investigate further. You can also use truss(1) > I can also provide updated linux_base/linux_devtools-7 ports, which > include bison/sed/cut/etc. which are needed for configure scripts to run > in a chrooted linux-environment Please don't. The ports should be minimal. They are specifically not designed to create a standalone (chrootable) environment. They are specifically designed to allow anyone to add packages themselves. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message