From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 18:49:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12B016A405 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 18:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB3A13C4BF for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 18:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1F820A7; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:25:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D14820A6; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:25:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0DF1B55BC; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:25:56 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) To: Mike Meyer References: <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <20070511051852.GA89359@xor.obsecurity.org> <17988.32573.910854.388638@bhuda.mired.org> <200705111011.52212.fcash@ocis.net> <17988.46905.9205.461424@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 20:25:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <17988.46905.9205.461424@bhuda.mired.org> (Mike Meyer's message of "Fri\, 11 May 2007 14\:34\:33 -0400") Message-ID: <86zm48ziks.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:49:20 -0000 Mike Meyer writes: > Moving the OS into the package system has been on the "todo" list for > a long time (assuming it's still there - there are people opposed to > that). It has *never* been on the todo list. > How would setting LOCALBASE=3D/usr break this? Of course, equally valid > is the question "what will break if I set LOCALBASE=3D/usr"? Hmm. I > think I may found out.... For one, man pages for ports will end up in the wrong place (/usr/man instead of /usr/share/man). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no