From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 10 06:58:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C882916A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 06:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD43043D49 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 06:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i3ADu2P8035947 for cvs-src@FreeBSD.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:56:02 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (rik.cronyx.ru [172.22.4.1]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i3ADrJi6035842; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:53:20 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <4077FE63.4010602@cronyx.ru> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:02:11 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020610 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <8536.1081595494@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Bruce M Simpson cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Mark Murray cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/random Makefile src/sys/dev/random randomdev.h randomdev_soft.c randomdev_soft.h yar X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:58:32 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >In message <200404100854.i3A8sa0w066414@grimreaper.grondar.org>, Mark Murray wr >ites: > > > >>If it is felt that further whitening of the VIA C3 RNG is needed, >>then I believe that Yarrow would be overkill, and that a much smaller >>hash function will be sufficient. >> >> > >How about we recognize that different users needs different levels of >randomness ? > >Couldn't we provide at three levels of random bits: > > 1. "Random enough for games" > > 2. "Random enough for money" > > 3. "Random enough for lives" > How about computations? > >Would that be feasible ? > > > >