From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 12:00:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA23382 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 12:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA23375 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 12:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA07308 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:00:18 -0700 Message-Id: <199602122000.NAA07308@rover.village.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anybody using netns? In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 12 Feb 1996 12:45:29 MST Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:00:18 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Purhaps there should be a separate area for unsupported hunks of code so they don't disappear forever. I worry that code placed in the attic will eventually be deleted for good. If it is elsewhere, but available, then people that want it can get it, while people that don't won't have to worry about it. In other words, make them unsupported source packages, AS IS. Finally, I don't believe that -current represents all of the user base. While the conclusion reached by a survey of -current might be congruent with those of the entire community, you might find more people using this stuff than you had originally thought... Anyway, just my two cents. Warner