From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 03:44:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9FD106566B; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6787D15F0ED; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EA23C08.6060906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:44:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato References: <201110182200.19244.jhugo@meraka.csir.co.za> <0BF0188F-777F-4FC3-9DB3-48FE22ACC31A@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4E9DFE11.2070203@swin.edu.au> <20111019.162942.833544516395329713.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20111019.162942.833544516395329713.hrs@allbsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net, jhugo@meraka.csir.co.za, mrossi@swin.edu.au, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPv6 accept_rtadv + bfe0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:44:10 -0000 On 10/19/2011 00:29, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Mattia Rossi wrote > in <4E9DFE11.2070203@swin.edu.au>: > > mr> So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing "inet6" to ifconfig > mr> automatically? > > No. You always need to add the inet6 keyword wherever needed. That seems redundant, and contrary to how the IPv4 equivalents work. And obviously it's confusing to users. From what I can see looking at some 7.x and 8.x systems it also seems to be a POLA violation. Perhaps this is something that you should reconsider? Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/