Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:55:57 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? Message-ID: <20060929235459.M73166@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <451D4787.4050309@samsco.org> <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up >>>> fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, >>>> so thanks for giving it a kickstart. >>> >>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. > Only >>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and > ufs >>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra > isofs >>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. >>> >> >> What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And don't >> forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the smell of >> fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. > > Baby steps aren't hard. :) Back when I first made rumblings about this sort > of thing we didn't have a sys/fs at all, but now we do and over time we've > actually moved most of our filesystems into it. :) The great thing about moving all the network subtrees around is how we can break the compile of all the existing applications that include net/*, netinet/*, netinet6/*, etc, all in one pass. :-) Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060929235459.M73166>