From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 25 1:30:56 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F82237B591; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:30:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA93708; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:30:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Peter Wemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/usr.bin/openssl Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/scp Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/ssh Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/ssh-add Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/ssh-agent Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/ssh-keygen Makefile ... In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:08:25 PST." Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:30:49 -0800 Message-ID: <93705.951471049@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > There is no reason for anyone !US to be using RSAREF, since it's inferior > to the openssl native RSA implementation inside libcrypto. So you're saying there's a disparity between the libcrypto in the international crypto repository and the one in the US, or that non-US sites still need to wholesale replace this library? I thought getting away from that was the whole point of abstracting rsaref away, if so. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message