From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 15:16:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E4616A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:16:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9C043D41 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:16:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAKFJ3qe045674; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 08:19:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <419F5FF5.3020409@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 08:17:09 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mailinglists@debank.tv References: <25075.81.206.188.203.1100890359.squirrel@81.206.188.203> In-Reply-To: <25075.81.206.188.203.1100890359.squirrel@81.206.188.203> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdlabel and sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:16:50 -0000 mailinglists@debank.tv wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a bit in the dark how to use the bsdlabel facility on FBSD-5.3-STABLE. > I'm supposed to give an architecture flag but it doesn't support sparc64. > What's going wrong (or better yet: what am I doing wrong ?) > The system is an Ultra-10. > > > bavke# bsdlabel -e /dev/ad0 > bsdlabel: a -m option must be specified > > bavke# bsdlabel -e -m sparc64 /dev/ad0 > bsdlabel: Unsupported architecture > > bavke# bsdlabel -e -m i386 /dev/ad0 > bsdlabel: /dev/ad0: no valid label found > > > bavke# mount > /dev/ad0a on / (ufs, local) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > /dev/ad1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) > > > Rob Evers You should actually be using the 'sunlabel' program on this platform since that is the format that the firmware expects. The 'disklabel' program is installed as a link to the appropriate label program for the platform. Scott