From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 8 16:58:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA27669 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 May 1997 16:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA27664 for ; Thu, 8 May 1997 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1) id 0wPd4G-0007Qm-00; Thu, 8 May 1997 17:57:48 -0600 To: Jason Thorpe Subject: Re: Alpha questions.. Cc: Ben Black , Brandon Gillespie , hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 May 1997 16:31:58 PDT." <199705082331.QAA20330@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> References: <199705082331.QAA20330@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 17:57:48 -0600 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199705082331.QAA20330@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> Jason Thorpe writes: : ...and it's not like it really _matters_... the dispatch happens : exactly once... and, really, how expensive is looking for PT_NOTE : compared to doing the VM stuff necessary to map the executable? Likely in the noise. : OLF has at least two problems: : : (1) doesn't scale : (2) unnecessarily breaks compatibility Yup. Warner