From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 21:17:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCEC16A416 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930BF43D75 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:17:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAOLHweO068263; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:17:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kAOLHuBP012313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:17:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200611242117.kAOLHuBP012313@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:18:03 -0500 To: Divacky Roman From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20061124210305.GA49228@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <4557FF7A.8020704@samsco.org> <200611132054.kADKsFvK045726@lava.sentex.ca> <4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org> <200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca> <7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net> <200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca> <20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca> <1164356894.4306.1.camel@massimo.datacode.it> <200611242027.kAOKRYZg012113@lava.sentex.ca> <20061124210305.GA49228@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:17:59 -0000 At 04:03 PM 11/24/2006, Divacky Roman wrote: >On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 03:28 AM 11/24/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > > >On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:52 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > > > >> I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference. > > > > > >That would be very interesting. > > > > OpenBSD 4.0 i386 panics on boot. > > > > I also posted some results with PMC compiled into the kernel > > > > ipfw compiled into the kernel, with 1 rule > > > > http://www.tancsa.com/pmc/ > >I see generic_bzero/bcopy used quite often. why dont you define >cpu I586_CPU >in your kernel config? Hi, I had cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU Are you saying cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU or just have cpu I586_CPU >also... bde@ just commited some bzero-related optimizations to routing >code.. might be work trying.. I think that was already in there, but I will cvsup upto today and see if there is any difference. ---Mike