From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 23 23:42:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54501106564A; Wed, 23 May 2012 23:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318988FC08; Wed, 23 May 2012 23:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4NNfsh1022421; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:41:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4NNfsQI022420; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:41:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:41:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dimitry Andric Message-ID: <20120523234154.GA22380@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201205221818.q4MII7lk019626@svn.freebsd.org> <4FBCCED9.9050308@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FBCCED9.9050308@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r235797 - head/contrib/gcc X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:42:00 -0000 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-22 20:18, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > Log: > > Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit platforms. ... > Until all the additional warnings this causes have been fixed, can this > commit please be reverted for now? Yes. I cannot believe we've been abusing "%q" this badly. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)