From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jul 30 13: 9:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9025514EDB for ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 13:09:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA07386; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:08:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: janus.syracuse.net: green owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... In-Reply-To: <8605.933365173@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > There's no good reason to not have bpf in at least the boot disk kernel. > > It already is. That's not the question under discussion here - we're > talking about how to make things work in the post-installation boot > scenario. When did that happen? :) In that case, my argument changes to: "There's no good reason not to have bpf in the GENERIC kernel." > > - Jordan > Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message