Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:52:31 -0400
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>, Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net>,  ports-secteam@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Eradication of old java
Message-ID:  <55A3DEBF.1070302@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1436729497.3932791.321743777.380D37FD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <1436722739.2838428.321692425.3A1ABDF2@webmail.messagingengine.com> <55A2BB79.6030907@delphij.net> <1436729497.3932791.321743777.380D37FD@webmail.messagingengine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/12/2015 15:31, Mark Felder wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015, at 14:09, Xin Li wrote:
>> 
>> On 7/12/15 10:38, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> How long before we start to eradicate old java from the ports
>>> tree? I'm actually in the process of updating a couple ports of
>>> mine to require Java 1.8 now that it is supported, vs 1.6 as
>>> users currently are being required to use.
>>> 
>>> Java 6 was EoL last year, Java 7 in April this year.
>>> 
>>> I'm considering doing a search of the ports tree to gather
>>> some info and see how many can just have the java requirement
>>> bumped.
>> 
>> I think we should move this discussion to -java@ and/or
>> maintainers -- there is no known security issues and it's better
>> to give it more public exposure.
>> 
>> My suggestion would be to deprecate both Java 6 and 7 now and
>> remove them after a few (3?) months if there is nobody
>> volunteering to maintain them.
>> 
>> (IIRC Java 6 have some security settings that e.g. IPMI console 
>> applications require, but I doubt if FreeBSD users actually use
>> these because such applications usually ships with some native
>> binary blobs)
>> 
> 
> Is Java 6 and 7 still receiving updates through OpenJDK upstream?
> As far as I'm aware they are not, so the next batch of CVEs that
> come out put those users in a bad position.
> 
> Can java@ team provide any details?

Both OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 are actively maintained.  For example,
there will be OpenJDK6 b36 soon:

https://java.net/jira/browse/OPENJDK6-60

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVo964AAoJEHyflib82/FGI3gH/iQvZpWi9A7J2RsnSoug7+r5
3ePT3ruKKeJ3B9h/85rUVx54tsZpw5p+X2tLNi1Fk7TdkPyn9P6SVD0UHytMbmNs
/UxVy/P0+SFnA6qXeC18FcKQ8GJ1jfuBtCz9+DbaE1S+mBPHyxdR3zn3Dyf3eLhN
dkveONKprS2NxQibvJMKBI/0xOT2YXpl2tZka/SZ61exTG6mTAXY9xm+AJwGJG4x
8TbVucqlYpc6bwMQN70FY8PAgYhqbskFx3+eDGMQTKe+NFqMILxCYw7MB/sQmths
hO9wP13ztV61vJhgNUoKIeyZigd8E5RH3FQM1Xg27UMK0Y/O7tt4jNe3JYW6tG0=
=GiO4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55A3DEBF.1070302>