From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:37:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30E51065670; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFD28FC15; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA24363; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:36:58 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1PQp6g-000Pv7-4u; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:36:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4D015A09.7070608@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:36:57 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Cran References: <201012072046.oB7KkB4L079555@svn.freebsd.org> <4CFEAD09.30904@freebsd.org> <4CFEAFA6.4020103@feral.com> <4CFEB1AD.70906@freebsd.org> <20101208153857.H1428@besplex.bde.org> <20101208225235.501ced0e@core.draftnet> <20101209191657.B1400@besplex.bde.org> <20101209221458.42448075@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101209221458.42448075@core.draftnet> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans , Bruce Cran , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Matthew Jacob Subject: Re: svn commit: r216269 - head/sys/geom/part X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:37:14 -0000 on 10/12/2010 00:14 Bruce Cran said the following: > Since it appears that disks are still using the CHS fields despite > having been obsolete since ATA-7 I guess it makes sense to continue > printing them. I apologize for repeating myself, that probably starts to be annoying... We read some reserved/unused/obsolete bytes and get some garbage in them. The fact that the garbage looks like "valid" (for some definition of "valid") CHS parameters doesn't mean that those are really valid, or CHS parameters, or we should use them, or we should even report them, even for debug. That's my personal position and I am sticking to it :-) -- Andriy Gapon