Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:07:37 -0700 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ulrich Spoerlein <uqs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r220401 - in head: . share/mk tools/build/mk tools/build/options Message-ID: <BANLkTik=kCL79VrcWsChoRexjxgdfCAB2Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110406210416.GA62173@freebsd.org> References: <201104062008.p36K8NR0015687@svn.freebsd.org> <20110406210416.GA62173@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 14:04, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed Apr =A06 11, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >> Author: uqs >> Date: Wed Apr =A06 20:08:23 2011 >> New Revision: 220401 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220401 >> >> Log: >> =A0 Complete WITHOUT_CXX support. It implies WITHOUT_GROFF and >> =A0 WITHOUT_CLANG. > > is there no way to build clang/llvm without CXX support? Clang and LLVM are written in C++. Even if their support for compiling C++ could be disabled, you'd still need a C++ cross-compiler to build them, which ought to be disabled by WITHOUT_CXX, right?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTik=kCL79VrcWsChoRexjxgdfCAB2Q>