From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 31 18:12:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA06449
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 18:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA06425
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 18:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA04215; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:10:55 +1100
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:10:55 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199602010210.NAA04215@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, mrcpu@cdsnet.net
Subject: Re: Problem with 2.1-stable unistd.h?
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

>Something is weird around line 53 in unistd.h, with the __dead2 declaration.

>I was trying to build the new bind, and it barfs on that line, and the 
>line doesn't look good.

`bind' probably replaced the system header <sys/cdefs.h> that defines
__dead2.

Bruce