From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 25 21:26:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.254.60.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFDE37B403; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 21:21:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from intruder.bmah.org ([24.176.204.87]) by femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010826042141.NLST4874.femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com@intruder.bmah.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 21:21:41 -0700 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.11.5/8.11.3) id f7Q4LZK84037; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 21:21:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200108260421.f7Q4LZK84037@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Wilko Bulte Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , FreeBSD hackers list , nik@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports In-Reply-To: <20010825174208.A1269@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20010824174016.A45724@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241605.f7OG5GW49491@intruder.bmah.org> <20010824190806.A46103@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241725.f7OHPfB50419@intruder.bmah.org> <20010824194405.A46482@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241752.f7OHqox51679@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825001408.B47203@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108242311.f7ONBIt56794@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825083659.A51201@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108251457.f7PEvVW45896@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825174208.A1269@freebie.xs4all.nl> Comments: In-reply-to Wilko Bulte message dated "Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:42:08 +0200." From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-470040324P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 21:21:35 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-470040324P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Oh heck. Alphas build docs with openjade, not jade. We forgot to deal > > with that in the definition of ${MINIMALDOCPORTS}, so release builds > > containing docs but not a ports tree will break on the Alpha. > > Not knowing much, if anything (ok, it is a green stone, I saw plenty > of Chines jade artwork while in Macau) about jade: why is the alpha > different from x86 in this respect? Haven't been to Macau...but there's lots of jade in Hong Kong too. :-) > Meaning: why not use common tools? [my ignorance around the docproj > stuff is showing here] openjade is a descendent of jade (I don't think jade is being developed anymore). For some reason, jade has some problems running on the Alpha. I asked nik once why we don't just use openjade for everything...I think the answer was that there were some issues with languages using multi-byte characters. Personally, I run openjade on most of my i386 boxes (it's an option for that architecture). (These things are SGML parsers, BTW. That's about the extent of my knowledge.) > > OK. Can you apply the following patch to Makefile.inc.docports? It's > > against HEAD but it should apply equally well to RELENG4 because the > > files (modulo CVS strings) are identical. [...time passes...report of apparent success...] Yay! OK, I'll commit this "soon" (kind of brain-dead right now, don't trust myself to do commits properly). If you get to it first, that's fine too. > > No...we just forgot this aspect of the Alpha docs build. People who > > build releases with full ports should be fine. > > You forgot the :-).. building all ports will take aeons (I suspect; > I would be surprised if it didnot) No...I just meant building the ports tree itself, not all of the packages. In other words, if you don't set "NOPORTS=YES", a complete ports tree gets checked out and tarred up for the distribution. The docproj ports get built out out of this ports tree, so the definition of ${MINIMALDOCPORTS} is moot. If you set "NOPORTS=YES", then only the ports in ${MINIMALDOCPORTS} get checked out of the repo, and that's where you (we?) got bitten. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-470040324P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE7iHlO2MoxcVugUsMRAp9PAKCoO4rFy12HVsmR5JeC+rVPg7aj5wCgrg9r rFtZVlxaF8N3JYkWxhiDErA= =TI9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-470040324P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message