From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 4 19:12:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FBE16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7B43D5D for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FFcAY-0006e8-4A; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:11:58 +0300 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FFcBy-000MkP-8Q; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:13:26 +0300 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <84702749@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060304205558.58f56036@it.buh.tecnik93.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:13:26 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20060304205558.58f56036@it.buh.tecnik93.com> (Ion-Mihai Tetcu's message of "Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:55:58 +0200") Message-ID: <18621081@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [:blank:] file/directory name endings at pkg-plist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:12:03 -0000 On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:55:58 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:45:38 +0300 > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > FYI here are the ports that have [:blank:] file/directory name endings > > at pkg-plist. The ports tree was cvsupped at 21:30:00 +0300 from > > cvsup.freebsd.org. > Maybe you could submit a PR containing a patch obtained wit cvs diff -u ? I'm not sure if I should. The case is not vital and is not hard to repair. But the are many maintainers to receive feedback. Or may portmgr@ approve the commit (I'm not saying before 6.1 and 5.5 relearse) without maintainer's feedback? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider