From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 3 7: 3:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22EF37B401; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grillolja.cs.umu.se (grillolja.cs.umu.se [130.239.40.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88AB43E4A; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:03:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tdv94ped@cs.umu.se) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavisd-new (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6617A037; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:03:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kvist.cs.umu.se (kvist.cs.umu.se [130.239.40.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by grillolja.cs.umu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AB6A032; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:03:09 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:03:08 +0200 (MEST) From: Paul Everlund To: Matthew Emmerton Cc: Garance A Drosihn , Poul-Henning Kamp , Sheldon Hearn , Marc Recht , Alexander Langer , , Subject: Re: expat2 in the base system? In-Reply-To: <007f01c26ae2$09b11ab0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new amavisd-new-20020630 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > In message , Garance A Drosihn > writes: > > > > Any famous last words before the fat lady sings ? > > My biggest concern is the minority of users installing expat2 from > ports/packages and then not being able to figure out how to use it, since > they always get expat1 since /usr/bin comes before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. > I'm sure there will also be issues with autoconf-based ports that don't do > proper version checking of libraries which will pick up static libs / > headers from /usr instead of /usr/local as well. Isn't that something that should be incorporated into the system at install time, that /usr/local/bin always should have precedence over /usr/bin? And this shouldn't be something you would have to change manually? As /usr/local/bin always contains newer versions than /usr/bin, if an application is installed that also is in the base system, /usr/local/bin should always "win" over /usr/bin. Or are there some disadvantages over this? Best regards, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message