Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 May 2001 21:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com>
To:        msmith@freebsd.org
Cc:        roelof@nisser.com, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Administrative tag a possibility?
Message-ID:  <20010519044122.3333C113D10@netcom1.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <200105170543.f4H5hvZ01232@mass.dis.org> (message from Mike Smith on Wed, 16 May 2001 22:43:56 -0700)
References:   <200105170543.f4H5hvZ01232@mass.dis.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I was actually thinking, myself, after doing about 20 upgrades, that
it would surely be nice if mergemaster could tell, by checksum or
other means, that you had not modified the original file and therefore
it was subject to a unilateral upgrade.

- Mike H.

   Cc: stable@freebsd.org
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
   Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 22:43:56 -0700
   From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
   Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
   X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
   Precedence: bulk

   > Being in a cycle of updates I got once again confronted - though assisted
   > by mergemaster - with a series of needless needs to accord administrative
   > changes like:
   > 
   > -----
   >   *** Displaying differences between ./etc/gettytab and installed version
   > 
   > --- /etc/gettytab       Mon Feb 15 11:45:33 1999
   > +++ ./etc/gettytab      Thu May 17 07:15:19 2001
   > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
   > -#      $Id: gettytab,v 1.16 1998/09/02 01:34:55 brian Exp $
   > +# $FreeBSD: src/etc/gettytab,v 1.16.2.1 1999/08/29 14:18:43 peter Exp $
   >  #      from: @(#)gettytab      5.14 (Berkeley) 3/27/91
   >  #
   >  # Most of the table entries here are just copies of the old getty table,
   > -----
   > 
   > Which got me thinking, dangerous though it may be, would it really not
   > be possible to devise some secret handshake that would allow a tool
   > like mergemaster or even - yeah, I'm stretching concepts - a human to
   > recognize such a change for what it is and act correspondingly?
   > 
   > Say introducing a convention like '$!$' to denote an always to be
   > acceptable change?

   No, not acceptable.

   In this case, mergemaster should be smart enough to notice that the file 
   in question was unchanged before the merge, and just not irritate you in 
   the first place.

   -- 
   ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
   rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
   to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
   people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
	      V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E



   To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
   with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010519044122.3333C113D10>