From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Nov 18 14:47:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA18525
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA18518
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:47:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA01561; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 17:52:25 -0500
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 17:52:25 -0500
Message-Id: <199611182252.RAA01561@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
From: dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
Subject: Re: changed to: Frac T3?
Cc: isp@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Joe says,

>Here is a point though where Dennis will philosophically disagree with me,
>and that is all right.  Dennis makes a big point out of the fact that a
>UNIX router can perform other services too...  I do NOT believe in that
>paradigm.  So for me, specializing a UNIX kernel for a router would not
>be a bad concept, but Dennis probably would not agree.

I dont disagree (in fact we may have to do it to route T3), but it will be
a specialized functions, not for everyone.

Dennis