From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 23:20:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ED6106564A; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net) Received: from mail.dawidek.net (60.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566698FC08; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (58.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.58]) by mail.dawidek.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73783635; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:20:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:18:53 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <20120108231852.GB1654@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <201201080055.q080tMlJ063808@svn.freebsd.org> <20120108104330.GC1674@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wq9mPyueHGvFACwf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r229800 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:20:02 -0000 --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 02:58:56PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 8 January 2012 02:43, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > If someone is actually using GENERIC kernel. This change will break all > > my system next time I upgrade. Adding UFS_ACL option to the kernel > > config to make ZFS kernel module to work doesn't sound very intuitive. > > > > I understand what you are trying to accomplish, but we really need to > > find better way to do this. Until then, could you back it out? >=20 > I'd rather find a cleaner solution - it's pulling in code which just > isn't being used if you aren't using UFS_ACL or ZFS. >=20 > How about wrapping those two up in a module which zfs can register a > dependency on? This would be one weird module, but let's see:) --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8KJFwACgkQForvXbEpPzTGRQCfWyUjj9PpumAdjSrTGYOUyrmr 2kkAoOJYDqB4/bSArLOBfweUbxGW94VA =OSLa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf--