From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 10:09:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97039106567C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@osx.kode5.net) Received: from osx.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CEA8FC22 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by osx.kode5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E637495E23 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:09:18 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osx.kode5.net Received: from osx.kode5.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osx.kode5.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3CF3nlCC9wk for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:09:08 +0100 (BST) Received: by osx.kode5.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 78562495DF6; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:09:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:09:08 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120908100908.GA13193@osx.kode5.net> References: <5049EA50.4040001@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: Darwin 11.4.0 x86_64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] Announcing the end of port CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 10:09:21 -0000 [ Lars Eighner wrote on Fri 7.Sep'12 at 10:00:45 -0500 ] > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > > >The development of FreeBSD ports is done in Subversion nowadays. > >For the sake of compatibility a Subversion to CVS exporter is > >in place which has some limitations. For CVSup mirroring cvsup > >based on Ezm3 is used which breaks regularly especially on amd64 > >and with Clang and becomes more and more unmaintainable. > > > What exactly is the motivation again for moving from things which work like > cvsup and gcc to things that are broken or lame like subversion and clang? They're not broken. I've recently been using them and they're fine. There has been plenty of discussion about the reasons for the changes so have a read from the various sites and list archives.