From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 10 13:20:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A18916A417 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D513C46A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7ADKCAV011409 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l7ADKCr2011408; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:12 GMT Message-Id: <200708101320.l7ADKCr2011408@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce M Simpson Cc: Subject: Re: bin/111493: routed doesn't use multicasts for RIPv2 via P2P interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce M Simpson List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/111493; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce M Simpson To: James Carlson Cc: Vernon Schryver , dan@obluda.cz, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/111493: routed doesn't use multicasts for RIPv2 via P2P interfaces Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:17:52 +0100 James Carlson wrote: > Defaulting what to "off?" The point of the patch (as I understood it) > was to use multicast on interfaces where the interface flags say > multicast is supported (IFF_MULTICAST) and where RIP-2 is configured > to run and multicast hasn't been explicitly disabled. > > Why would this work differently than it does on Ethernet? > Ah, I must have misunderstood the original intent. Please ignore! regards, BMS