From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 26 15:49:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99802106564A; Sat, 26 May 2012 15:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coder@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E9A8FC08; Sat, 26 May 2012 15:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [88.184.221.231]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C08DA616C; Sat, 26 May 2012 17:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:49:10 +0200 From: "coder.tuxfamily" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Hurling References: <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 15:49:20 -0000 Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit : > On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote: >> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ? >> >> I have the same problem with swig for php... > > Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes > with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64). > > One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the ports: > > Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least libkml? > > The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an > installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos, > graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others. > > Affected ports can be found for example with > find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" {} \; > > I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most > other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig > 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig ports > can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which > should be changed, of course). > Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses swig-1.3.40. I will try without specify version of swig.