Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 May 2012 17:49:10 +0200
From:      "coder.tuxfamily" <coder@tuxfamily.org>
To:        Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de>
Cc:        sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT)
Message-ID:  <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de>
References:  <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote:
>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ?
>>
>> I have the same problem with swig for php...
>
> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes
> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64).
>
> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the ports:
>
> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least libkml?
>
> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an
> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos,
> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others.
>
> Affected ports can be found for example with
> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" {} \;
>
> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most
> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig
> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig ports
> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which
> should be changed, of course).
>

Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses swig-1.3.40.
I will try without specify version of swig.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC0FB76.2070702>