Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:40:57 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Message-ID: <199907150540.WAA00420@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:58:21 %2B0900." <378D5C5D.13C65239@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > And what do you do, then, with the processes that happen to have > legitimate use for more stack? > > Or maybe you just find out how much stack each process uses, and > then set limits appropriate for each one? Which is the equivalent of > setting limits to each user, of course... You get a little program, like eg. Xenix and Minix had, which lets you modify the executable header to indicate how much stack the system should reserve. If the program decides to use more stack for some reason, then it dies; this is in effect "stack overcommit". 8) -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907150540.WAA00420>