Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:27:54 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Kane <mark@mkproductions.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Port Version Numbering Question Message-ID: <1131564474.2771.0.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <43724BBA.10006@mkproductions.org> References: <43724BBA.10006@mkproductions.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-NYbBep3fFH6bLDHBF00q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mark Kane p=ED=B9e v st 09. 11. 2005 v 13:19 -0600:
> Hi everyone. I'm nearing completion of my second FreeBSD port, however I
> have a quick question about a version number.
>=20
> The version as the author released it is "0.2.6-3". Since this is a new
> port to the FreeBSD ports collection and there was no "0.2.6-1" or
> "0.2.6-2" of this software actually released, I'm not sure if I should
> use PORTREVISION to call it "0.2.6_3" or if I should simply use
> PORTVERSION to call it "0.2.6.3". If neither are correct then how would
> I do this properly?
Distfile version -> PORTVERSION
Changes to port without distfile update -> PORTREVISION
So, ideally, you want 0.2.6.3. Also take look at DISTVERSION macro.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design and
sell shrubberies.
--=-NYbBep3fFH6bLDHBF00q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDck26ntdYP8FOsoIRAjL2AJ97OXccqAgik0KtPVDKuDgQqyTumQCfcXmV
dpL6sx+gQe68IRtPzcY1Dbs=
=P3B/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-NYbBep3fFH6bLDHBF00q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131564474.2771.0.camel>