Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:25:42 +0400 From: Seva Gluschenko <gvs@rinet.ru> To: Volker Stolz <stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/60585: ZMailer 2.99.56 is available, can be compiled for 5.x Message-ID: <407E38F6.9060405@rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040415071339.GB69658@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200404141554.i3EFsPGR083767@freefall.freebsd.org> <407E2DCB.3050108@rinet.ru> <20040415071339.GB69658@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Volker Stolz wrote: > The patch in the PR is by no means sufficient. I already spent too > much time tidying things up...to note a few: > > - an important patch got lost which installed the man-pages > - the plist wasn't updated > - packaging doesn't work correctly because some files in the plist > get removed (/var/spool/postoffice) that are not generated when > installing from the port instead of the package. > - FreeBSD has the possibility of running post-installation-scripts, > which is just what this port needs. It's just a matter of > spending time to make it work correctly. > - it installs empty directories, e.g. $PREFIX/sbin/bak. well, by all means, I have to learn about all this stuff more. > Even then, I'll probably wait with committing the changes until I can > find someone who actually runs this stuff as there is no maintainer who > can vouch for it. Would you like to become the maintainer for it? No, I wouldn't. This project isn't mine, I only grabbed it onto my attention once I needed it. Now I don't. -gvs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?407E38F6.9060405>