Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:55:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Alex Belits <abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@consys.com>, pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970516005340.8123C-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970515234343.15211C-100000@zen.cypher.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 May 1997, Ben Black wrote: > from reading the MOSIX docs it seems it *is* totally transparent and that > was one of their primary goals. MOSIX migrates processes mased on > resource use and handles connecting STDIN, STDOUT, and other resources > back to the "home node". when a process is migrated, nobody should > notice anything but better performance. Check out the whitepapers on Sprite. Single system image would be really nifty and if CCD could be extended to do ZebraFS like things... Anyhow back to reality. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970516005340.8123C-100000>