From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 4 14:43:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF3B1522F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 14:43:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10466; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:43:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:43:31 -0500 (EST) From: Adam To: Morten Seeberg Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Script to run at bootup In-Reply-To: <004501bf5701$d9863ba0$1600a8c0@SOS> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Any by-default functionality in /etc/rc.local was moved elsewhere in the rc scripts and rc.local was removed from the repository ; however if you make one (or never delete yours) it will continue to function. On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Morten Seeberg wrote: >> Tony Wells wrote in list.freebsd-questions: >> > Has the use of /etc/rc.local been deprecated since 3.0-STABLE? >> Yes. In fact, much earlier than that -- it has been >> deprecated and obsolated in 2.x-stable days. >> Use /usr/local/etc/rc.d instead. > >I never even knew this, will I risk loosing rc.local in the future??? > >It=B4s so easy to use, just add a line and thats it. I know Im lazy, but w= hy >should rc.d be better? > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message