From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 5 15:13:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.uninet.ee (smtp.uninet.ee [194.204.0.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1166C37B42C for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 15:13:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mauri@inspiral.net) Received: from inspiral.net (tigris-isdn-108.uninet.ee [194.204.61.108]) by smtp.uninet.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981892580C for ; Sun, 6 May 2001 00:13:37 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <3AF46C50.640F6C20@inspiral.net> Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 00:10:41 +0300 From: Lauri Laupmaa X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ISN number prediction ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6FAD5A09A8FD7F9E74579127" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --------------6FAD5A09A8FD7F9E74579127 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi As this analysis http://razor.bindview.com/publish/papers/tcpseq.html points out FreeBSD 4 ISN number generation 'is not impressive' It seems to be considerably weaker than linux-2.2's... Any comments about this ? -- L. On sul minut aega ? --------------6FAD5A09A8FD7F9E74579127 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi

As this analysis http://razor.bindview.com/publish/papers/tcpseq.html points out FreeBSD 4 ISN number generation 'is not impressive' It seems to be considerably weaker than linux-2.2's...

Any comments about this ?
--
L.

On sul minut aega ?
  --------------6FAD5A09A8FD7F9E74579127-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message