From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 21 12:39:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4513F16A421; Sun, 21 May 2006 12:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BC743D45; Sun, 21 May 2006 12:39:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k4LCdYxP024363; Sun, 21 May 2006 08:39:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:39:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: re@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shared library version bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 12:39:36 -0000 On Sun, 21 May 2006, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>> On Sun, 14 May 2006 04:51:41 +0900 >>>>>> Hajimu UMEMOTO said: > >>>>>> On Fri, 12 May 2006 13:44:58 -0400 (EDT) >>>>>> Daniel Eischen said: > >> I wish to fix following things which break ABI backward compatibility >> when libc version bump: >> >> - gethostbyaddr(3) prototype to conform to POSIX. >> - Fix wrong usage of EAI_MEMORY in getnameinfo(). It needs to >> return EAI_OVERFLOW. >> - Update res_update() and friends to BIND9's one. >> - Nuke some compatibility crufts for 6.X and earlier. > > deischen> Go ahead. Just realize though, that after 7.0 is released > deischen> you will have to support any ABI from then on without version > deischen> bumps (meaning, you have to keep shims for any old 7.0+ ABIs > deischen> in libc). > > ume> Okay, I'll do. > > Done. That's great, but we haven't had a library version bump yet ;-) -- DE