From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 18 13:21:31 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B88016A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:21:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com
	[209.69.98.4])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BFA43D62
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:21:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com)
Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	j1IDLRkt061599;	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:21:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com)
Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)j1IDLRIr061596;
	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:21:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:21:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050217183425.O53092@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Message-ID: <20050218081633.K637@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
References: <20050217140951.R637@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
 <20050217183425.O53092@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ntpdate behavior changes between 4.x, 5.x and CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:21:31 -0000


On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Doug White wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
>
>> This is the output of ntpdate on a 4.11 machine:
>> alpha# ntpdate -b time-b.nist.gov > /dev/null
>> alpha#
>
> ntpd 4.1.0
>
>> The following is output of ntpdate on a 5.3-stable machine:
>> vnode# ntpdate -b time-b.nist.gov > /dev/null
>> host found : time-b.nist.gov
>> vnode#
>
> ntpd 4.1.1a
>
>> The following is the output of ntpdate on a CURRENT machine:
>> bling# ntpdate -b time-b.nist.gov > /dev/null
>> bling#
>
> ntpd 4.2.0 + patch to suppress those messages, which was obtained from the
> upstream code.
>
> So the answer is "Because the vendor put it there, and we hid it again in
> -CURRENT."

Are there any plans to MFC ntpd 4.2.0? If adapting the patch for RELENG_5 
(And 4.1.1a) would make the process any easier, could I get my mittens on 
it?

Andy

| Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
| Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >