From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 21 10:45:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFED8153BB for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:40:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA08073; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:39:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA20723; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:39:35 -0600 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:39:35 -0600 Message-Id: <199908211739.LAA20723@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ollivier Robert Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pthread_set_concurrency() In-Reply-To: <19990821110856.A28321@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <199908210237.TAA69152@apollo.backplane.com> <199908210546.XAA18821@mt.sri.com> <19990821110856.A28321@keltia.freenix.fr> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > FreeBSD has no kernel 'thread' support, only user level. > > That's not strictly true. The fact is we have both kernel and user > threads but no mapping between the two... The kernel already > internally use some threads. Your definition of kernel threads and mine are obviously quite different. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message