Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 15:44:20 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303033 - head/share/man/man7 Message-ID: <CABh_MKnXt7X1L36wB0jrth-7zCvdyOKjPiiXvyYyfP7V9hqQbQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201607191746.u6JHk9ov092270@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201607191746.u6JHk9ov092270@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Ed, 2016-07-19 19:46 GMT+02:00 Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>: > +.It arm Ta soft Ta soft, double precision ... > +.It mips Ta soft Ta identical to double I was wondering, what's the difference between two ways of phrasing it? If long double is double precision, it's identical to double, right? > +.It Dv BYTE_ORDER Ta Either Dv BIG_ENDIAN or Dv LITTLE_ENDIAN . > +.Dv PDP11_ENDIAN is not used on FreeBSD. Would it make more sense to describe GCC/Clang's officially documented endianness macros here? __BYTE_ORDER__ __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ __ORDER_PDP_ENDIAN__ -- Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands KvK-nr.: 62051717
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABh_MKnXt7X1L36wB0jrth-7zCvdyOKjPiiXvyYyfP7V9hqQbQ>