From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 12 18:58:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3645638B; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C67516D8; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CDA33C2A; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:58:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 025E839860; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:58:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Bernhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= Subject: Re: redports.org No address record References: Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:58:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: ("Bernhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich=22's?= message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:08:33 +0200") Message-ID: <44k3o78tkg.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:58:31 -0000 Bernhard Fr=F6hlich writes: > Since our fetch(1) does not support proxies for HTTPS connections > it tries to lookup the domain himself and fails because it does not > have a DNS server or direct internet access. So in the end it is a > bug or missing feature of our fetch. I've CCD des@ just in case he > has a good idea. Is there some reason proxy support for HTTPS would be particularly difficult? There's already per-scheme handling for proxies, as I recall. I could try to make some time to implement this, if it's just=20 a matter of coding it up.