From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14:35:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FAF37B60A for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:35:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15288; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:35:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38B1BD43.A09E29E9@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:33:39 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera Cc: "Adam D. Marks" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? References: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> <14513.47681.137038.821262@onceler.kcilink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Vivek Khera wrote: > > >>>>> "DB" == Doug Barton writes: > > DB> "Adam D. Marks" wrote: > >> > >> I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for > >> different network interfaces. > > DB> No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the > DB> services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports > > Then what's the -a parameter to inetd for? Why not just run two > different inetd's bound to different IP addresses, one for each > interface? Well, that sounds like a good suggestion. I had assumed that the original poster had taken the time to look at the man page. Thanks for the tip, Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message