Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 May 2008 22:43:22 -0400
From:      Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net>
To:        "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: CFT: adding configuration file support to pkg_install
Message-ID:  <20080601024322.GA51402@shepherd>
In-Reply-To: <4841EF83.3000407@p6m7g8.com>
References:  <a01628140805300813r6a5f9912r99ec6f27a603a05f@mail.gmail.com> <4841BDA9.5090007@p6m7g8.com> <4841EF0D.8050201@FreeBSD.org> <4841EF83.3000407@p6m7g8.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote:

> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> packages are usually built from the ports tree, but not always, and users 
>> may use packages without a ports tree present on the local system.
> short of doing pkg_delete -af then pkg_add /some/dir
> are there any ports-mgmt/* tools for upgrades that don't need the ports 
> tree present.  I know portupgrade does.
                     
I do not think there are any such tools.  You can use the -PP flags with 
portupgrade to force it not to use the tree, and instead fetch packages from 
a remote site if they are not found locally.  However, an up-to-date tree is 
still required; the program has no other way to check what the latest version 
of any port is.                   

-- 
Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080601024322.GA51402>