From owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Fri Sep 18 06:59:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC71E9CE1BF for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 06:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk) Received: from s16892447.onlinehome-server.info (s16892447.onlinehome-server.info [82.165.15.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA2A7161A; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 06:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk) Received: from [2.219.74.29] (helo=[192.168.1.86]) by s16892447.onlinehome-server.info with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcpeC-0006Fk-JP; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:59:55 +0100 Message-ID: <55FBB662.4080708@ilande.co.uk> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:59:46 +0100 From: Mark Cave-Ayland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev , Marius Strobl CC: "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" References: <20150906124859.GA14919@FreeBSD.org> <20150907203152.GA70457@alchemy.franken.de> <55EDFE00.9090109@ilande.co.uk> <20150913022143.GA7862@alchemy.franken.de> <20150913103940.GA60101@FreeBSD.org> <20150913180126.GC7862@alchemy.franken.de> <55F89861.1030107@ilande.co.uk> <20150916031030.GA6711@FreeBSD.org> <55F9C2B8.7030605@ilande.co.uk> <20150916211914.GD18789@alchemy.franken.de> <20150917082817.GA71811@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150917082817.GA71811@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2.219.74.29 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk Subject: Re: PCI range checking under qemu-system-sparc64 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:45:44 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on s16892447.onlinehome-server.info); Unknown failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 06:59:58 -0000 On 17/09/15 09:28, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: >> [...] >> Which suggest that the next thing to investigate is the CMD646 >> emulation. Is there a particular reason why QEMU emulates a >> CMD646U rather than a plain CMD646 as found in the real sun4u >> machines of the USIIe/i era? >> >> Alexey, does building the port with CDROM_DMA disabled make >> a difference? > > Ironically I had it already disabled prior to your question; but I've > rebuilt the port enabling it for completeness' sake. It did not make > a difference. > > Then I've disabled all CAM/ATA stuff (scbus, ata, umass, etc.) in the > kernel config and that's what I see now (this is with CDROM_DMA=on): What does the CAM/ATA stuff do here? Does this mean it may not necessarily be an interrupt issue if you can get to mounting the root fs with CDROM_DMA=on? ATB, Mark.