From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 31 15:37:48 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA12093 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:37:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from servo.ccr.org (servo.ccr.org [198.3.0.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA12082 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:37:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mo@servo.ccr.org) Received: (from mo@localhost) by servo.ccr.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id SAA02589 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 18:37:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mo) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 18:37:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike O'Dell" Message-Id: <199901312337.SAA02589@servo.ccr.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: a nit, however.... Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG any reason why the kernel "config" program shouldn't be changed to dramatically reduce the requirement for the silling quoting of option values??? if an option needs embedded whitespace, but other than that, is there any reason other than historical for the silliness about nubmers, etc?? -mo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message