From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 21:57:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18D11065673 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CBD8FC08 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB2LvhmA016970; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:57:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mB2LvhQ8016967; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:57:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:57:43 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Peter Giessel In-Reply-To: <46703346351880256269680332892534375073-Webmail@me.com> Message-ID: <20081202225725.B16927@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <46703346351880256269680332892534375073-Webmail@me.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Dan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:57:53 -0000 > performance and 1.8 times higher than freebsd 4 UP performance." > > Please explain how DragonFly's lack of SMP affects the UP performance? doesn't affect of course. yes dragonflybsd is slower.