Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:49:53 -0600
From:      Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org>
To:        Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject:   Re: Silly IRQ allocation on Dell 1950
Message-ID:  <20061103144953.GA94194@nowhere>
In-Reply-To: <E1GfwlC-000Lrw-Pa@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
References:  <XFMail.20061102080327.jdp@polstra.com> <454A1E47.9060200@samsco.org> <E1GfwlC-000Lrw-Pa@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:58:54PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
> with all the hipe on virtualization, I'm wandering if the day
> will come and we will have virtual irqs ...

MSI could very well be described as a "virtual irq".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_Signaled_Interrupts

Craig



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061103144953.GA94194>