From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 17 22:02:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1F216A494 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from mail.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3960C13C44B for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from [212.61.27.67] (opteron.digiware.nl [212.61.27.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F090117011; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:01:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45AE9D4D.1090901@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:03:57 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200701161934.l0GJY1mh057095@ambrisko.com> <45AD3507.402@withagen.nl> <20070116203739.GA343@xor.obsecurity.org> <45AE2922.7040306@withagen.nl> <20070117210212.GA40454@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070117210212.GA40454@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scott Oertel , Willem Jan Withagen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: running mksnap_ffs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:02:05 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't >>> determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for >>> the snapshot operation to finish. >> Just upgraded to 6.2-STABLE, and I must say that things are a LOT better: >> >> - It did return a prompt >> - and ran for about 30 minutes on 1,5T >> - Performance gets a little slugish. >> - Playing MP3 of a samba share missed only one beat. >> >> In all it is usable to take snapshots over night. >> >> So that makes me a happy camper... > > That's good - although I don't remember you mentioning you weren't > running 6.2, or I would have told you to do this immediately to pick > up the various fixes made over the past N months. Actually I was running 6.2-something, where something was probably from around mid September. So I've now caught up with that. Something I did indicate when the discussion started, but then that is already a "long" time ago. --WjW