From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 29 16:03:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA21955
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA15033
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 14:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA12918; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:36:36 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:36:36 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199602292236.PAA12918@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), nate@sri.MT.net, dufault@hda.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to use the sup'd CVS tree?
In-Reply-To: <199602292211.PAA12340@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References: <4345.825628593@time.cdrom.com>
	<199602292211.PAA12340@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I don't know how unique I am -- I'm doing active developement without
> commit priviledges.  Contrary to Nate's implication, this is not sour
> grapes; I fully understand the political climate that led to this,
> even if I don't fully agree with it in all respects (the Lite2 code
> integration *is* something I agree with).

I'm sorry if you think I think you're upset with this.  I also agree
that this is something others will be in.  And, I think Jordan agrees as
well, else we wouldn't be having this conversation.

> I'm afraid it really wants a much larger tool than CVS.  8-(.

I agree.  This is a *hard* problem (I'm repeating myself).


Nate