Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 20:03:10 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006202002000.1098-100000@thelab.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200006201902.NAA71105@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > : > >Okay, I'll drop working on FreeBSD until next year then. 'so long. > : > > : > Thanks! [*] > > So what if I had said it PHK? I think this "we'll ram it down your > throats for the good of the project" attitude is extremely bad. > > I want to continue to do NEWCARD work, and that work is done in - > current. if -current is so unstable that I cannot do the work for a > long period of time, the only other real choice I'd have is to do it > in -stable and MFS -> current once the dust has sttled, and that's a > big no no. Which one would be harder to merge back into -current from a branch? Your NEWCARD work or the SMP work? Why not make a branch for NEWCARD and when the SMP work is declared stable, *you* spend the effort of merging it back in? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006202002000.1098-100000>