From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 16 08:47:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8471065670 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-out2.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-OUT2.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC9F8FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,197,1238968800"; d="scan'208";a="213150635" Received: from zivmaildisp2.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.143]) by zivm-relay2.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2009 10:47:23 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id 97A711B0765; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:47:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: , Bruce Cran Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hard drive performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:47:26 -0000 thanks guys. sorry for the newbie question. ;) Chris Rees schrieb am 2009-04-15: > 2009/4/15 Bruce Cran : > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:54:13 +0200 (CEST) > > Alexander Best wrote: > >> hi there, > >> i have 2 hard drives running. the first one is SATA300 and the > >> other > >> one UDMA100. here are the dmesg entries: > >> ad0: 238474MB at ata0-master SATA300 > >> ad1: 157066MB at ata4-master > >> UDMA100 > >> i've tried to test the drives' performances using the following > >> commands: > >> dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=300 > >> and > >> dd if=/dev/ad1 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=300 > >> the results are: > >> ad0 = 314572800 bytes transferred in 4.325645 secs (72722751 > >> bytes/sec) ad1 = 314572800 bytes transferred in 5.166126 secs > >> (60891430 bytes/sec) > >> the results for ad0 are a bit disappointing though. is this normal > >> or > >> is bs=1m wrong? > > 70MB/s is a very good transfer rate for a hard drive. The 300MB/s > > rate > > refers to the maximum the physical interface can support, but > > drives > > never get close to that because they can't read from disk at that > > speed. > > -- > > Bruce Cran > Hehe, I think everyone makes that mistake when they're enthusiastic > and sometimes even somewhat experienced. It's always such a > disappointment when they realise, I remember when I did too. > Chris