From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 27 07:05:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE1416A4B3 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D6F44014 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:05:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BF1654BB; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:05:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28643-02; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:05:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (lardystuffer.demon.co.uk [212.228.40.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9483C654B7; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:05:31 +0100 (BST) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C46DEC9; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:05:25 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:05:25 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Stefan Farfeleder Message-ID: <20030927140525.GA3261@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <20030925092319.H5418@gamplex.bde.org> <49939.204.254.155.35.1064593320.squirrel@mail.migus.org> <20030927080420.N18558@gamplex.bde.org> <20030927105241.GG802@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030927105241.GG802@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sys/conf/DEFAULT[S] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:05:36 -0000 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:52:44PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > Similarly with FOOBAR's contents identical with SMP's contents except > > for including FOO instead of GENERIC. So the bug must be related to > > the file being included ... adding an empty or comment line to the > > beginning of FOO works around it. I guess there is an off-by-1 byte > > or line error switching the input stream. > > The problem is simply that the input stream is switched immediately to > the included file after reading the file name and the parser is still > waiting for its newline or semicolon from the production bde mentioned this problem to me a few months ago when I suggested we MFC the include feature to 4.x. Thanks for tracking it down! BMS